What Was The Main Reason Joseph Stalin Created Collective Farms?

What Was The Main Reason Joseph Stalin Created Collective Farms? The establishment of collective farms, known as kolkhoz, and state farms, called sovkhoz, was a crucial aspect of Stalinist modernization in rural areas. This article aims to explore the main reasons behind Joseph Stalin’s implementation of collective farms, analyzing the ideological doctrines, economic goals, and social transformations associated with this agricultural policy. By delving into the historical context and the impact on rural communities, we can gain a comprehensive understanding of the motives behind the creation of collective farms during Stalin’s regime.

What Was The Main Reason Joseph Stalin Created Collective Farms?
What Was The Main Reason Joseph Stalin Created Collective Farms?

Reason 1: Modernization and Rationalization

The primary objective of implementing collective farms was to support the overall modernization of Soviet society and rationalize agricultural production. Stalin sought to accelerate the country’s industrial development by increasing agricultural output and shifting resources from the agrarian sector to the industrial sector. By replacing private family management with collective ownership and cooperative farming, the intention was to streamline production and create larger, more efficient agricultural areas.

Reason 2: Class Struggle and Eliminating Kulaks

Stalin’s collectivization policy was driven by his ideology and the aim to eliminate the class of wealthy farmers known as kulaks. According to Stalinist ideology, the kulaks were seen as exploiting poorer farmers and obstructing the establishment of collective ownership. The ruthless fight against the kulaks involved their persecution, deportation, and even execution. However, this aggressive approach resulted in a significant decline in agricultural production initially, creating challenges for the collective farms.

Reason 3: Transformation of Social Relations

Collectivization led to the extinction of private family farming and the emergence of large collective agricultural areas. This transformation aimed to reshape social relations in rural areas. Unlike gradual land consolidation seen in Western Europe, the Eastern Bloc relied on various forms of coercion and repression to establish collective agricultural cooperatives and state farms. This forced transformation disrupted traditional social structures and redistributed land ownership.

Reason 4: Economic Pressure and Voluntary Entry

The entry into collective farms was officially presented as a voluntary process, but local communists exerted pressure on the peasants. Those who resisted faced economic consequences, including fines, imprisonment, and confiscation of their machinery. Some farmers were forcibly resettled, and their properties became the foundation for emerging unified agricultural cooperatives. The second wave of collectivization occurred later, resulting in a higher percentage of agricultural land being managed by cooperatives and state farms.

Reason 5: Economic Challenges and State Support

Collective farms encountered economic problems, including low productivity, poor wages, and migration of farmers to urban areas in search of better opportunities. The situation stabilized in the mid-1960s with significant state investments aimed at improving the standard of living within the cooperatives. State subsidies, the use of chemical fertilizers, and temporary work requirements for students became common practices. These measures aimed to uplift the cooperatives and raise their productivity.


Joseph Stalin’s creation of collective farms was driven by a combination of ideological, economic, and social factors. While the primary goals were rooted in modernization, class struggle, and the transformation of social relations, the implementation of collective farms posed numerous challenges and hardships for the rural population. However, it is important to acknowledge that the collective farms also provided jobs, improved living standards, and served as important institutions within the Czechoslovak countryside. The consequences of collectivization, both positive and negative, continue to shape the memories and narratives of those who lived through this period of history.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.