Rebecca Journey: Problem of Whiteness at UChicago

Rebecca Journey: Problem of Whiteness at UChicago. In recent years, the University of Chicago has gained recognition for its commitment to free speech and academic freedom. However, a recent incident involving Rebecca Journey, a lecturer at the university, has raised questions about how the institution handles campus controversies in the age of social media and online harassment. This article will delve into the incident, the university’s response, and the broader implications for academic discourse and freedom of expression.

Rebecca Journey: Problem of Whiteness at UChicago
Rebecca Journey: Problem of Whiteness at UChicago
(Image By : nytimes)

Details In Short :

“Rebecca Journey: Problem of Whiteness at UChicago

  • Date: November
  • Time: Unfolded over a period of time
  • Location: University of Chicago
  • Name: Rebecca Journey, lecturer
  • Age: Recent PhD graduate
  • Seminar Title: “The Problem of Whiteness”
  • Daniel Schmidt: Sophomore and conservative activist
  • Online Backlash: Harassment and threats on social media
  • Doxxing and Harassment Claims: Dr. Journey filed complaints
  • University’s Response: Dismissed claims, citing lack of evidence
  • The Chicago Statement: 2014 declaration on free speech
  • Implications and Moving Forward: Reevaluate policies, develop guidelines for online harassment, and protect academic freedom”

The Controversial Seminar: The Problem of Whiteness

Rebecca Journey, a cultural anthropologist and recent PhD graduate from the University of Chicago, designed an undergraduate seminar titled “The Problem of Whiteness.” The course aimed to explore the historical and cultural aspects of the racial category “white” and how it has evolved over time. While the course content itself was not unusual for an academic setting, the provocative title caught the attention of Daniel Schmidt, a sophomore and conservative activist.

The Online Backlash

Daniel Schmidt, who had a significant following on social media, took offense to the seminar’s title and accused it of promoting “anti-white hatred.” He posted a tweet sharing the course description, along with Dr. Journey’s photo and university email address. This action quickly escalated into a wave of online harassment, with Dr. Journey receiving hateful and threatening messages from strangers.

The Response: Doxxing and Harassment Claims

Feeling threatened and harassed, Dr. Journey decided to postpone her seminar until the spring semester. She also filed complaints with the university, accusing Mr. Schmidt of doxxing and harassing her. However, university officials dismissed her claims, stating that they had no evidence of Mr. Schmidt personally sending abusive emails and that the Chicago statement on free speech only restricts speech that constitutes a genuine threat or harassment.

Also Read : Lithium Explosion, North Carolina: Cause Behind the Explosion

The Limits of the Chicago Statement

The University of Chicago’s 2014 declaration on free speech, known as the Chicago statement, has become a model for other institutions struggling to manage campus controversies. However, the incident involving Rebecca Journey and Daniel Schmidt has exposed the limitations of the Chicago statement in addressing the new challenges posed by social media and online platforms. Isaac A. Kamola, from the organization Faculty First Responders, notes that the Chicago statement assumes good faith and a genuine interest in engaging ideas. However, the online ecosystem in which Daniel Schmidt operates does not prioritize conversation or open dialogue. The ease with which a single tweet can incite harassment and threats highlights the need to reassess the university’s approach to online behavior.

Geoffrey R. Stone, the law professor who led the faculty committee that drafted the Chicago statement, acknowledges that at the time of its creation, they did not anticipate the impact of online threats on free expression. The incident involving Rebecca Journey and Daniel Schmidt serves as a wake-up call, prompting universities to consider how they can protect academic freedom and open discourse in an increasingly interconnected world.

Implications for Academic Discourse

The case of Rebecca Journey highlights the challenges faced by academics who venture into sensitive and controversial topics. While universities value academic freedom, it is essential to establish safeguards against targeted harassment and abuse. Online platforms have amplified the reach and impact of these incidents, making it crucial for institutions to develop comprehensive policies to address online threats and protect their faculty members.

Moving Forward: Navigating the Changing Landscape

In light of the incident, the University of Chicago must reevaluate its policies and procedures for handling online harassment and threats against its faculty members. While the Chicago statement remains a valuable framework, it needs to be supplemented with guidelines specifically addressing the unique challenges presented by social media platforms. This includes providing support systems for affected faculty, raising awareness about online harassment, and fostering respectful and constructive dialogue among students.


The case of Rebecca Journey and the controversy surrounding her seminar on the problem of whiteness at the University of Chicago shed light on the evolving nature of academic discourse and the challenges posed by online harassment. The incident serves as a reminder that institutions of higher education must adapt their policies and practices to address the complexities of the digital age while upholding the principles of academic freedom and free expression. By doing so, universities can create an environment that encourages open dialogue, intellectual growth, and the pursuit of knowledge.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.